UPDATE: Alleged 'Whistleblower' Eric Ciaramella Involved with Steele Dossier?!

UPDATE: Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Involved with Steele Dossier?!

Written by Radix Verum
October 14, 2019 at 11:05 am

October 14, 2019 – We have been covering the ongoing ‘whistleblower’ saga, and reporting on what we have been uncovering. I first reported on the possible identity of the whistleblower on October 10, 2019. The next day the New York Times filed a FOIA seeking information on Eric Ciaramella.

I then discovered more information that appears to corroborate the story and on the 11th, I wrote Part II regarding this so-called ‘whistleblower.’ A quick review of those will bring you up to date on some of the background information.

Some of the comments I received in response to my reporting were critical of me potentially exposing the identity of this person. I want to make something very clear to you: I am an investigative journalist. My own identity was unmasked by Ben Collins at NBC which caused me and my family to receive death threats from Antifa. I am not ambivalent about these kinds of concerns, as I have firsthand experience with it. However, this individual did not go through the proper whistleblower channels. They colluded with partisan House Democrats BEFORE filing the complaint with the ICIG.

Nothing about this process has been transparent or normal. This individual has raised well over $200k and is being represented by a team of super lawyers. It is my belief that the public’s right to know who is making these claims far outweighs any potential risk to the leaker.

The Democrats have begun secret impeachment proceedings, putting a barrier between the public and the truth. One can imagine the upheaval that a baseless impeachment could cause, potentially a civil war. The leaker knew this when he chose to lie about the president’s phone call with the leader of Ukraine. We now know that Ukraine had re-opened the investigation into Burisma several months before the President’s phone call.

According to True Pundit:

According to Solomon, a new document “shows that Ukrainian officials had opened a new probe into the firm linked to Hunter Biden months before President Trump’s phone call with that country’s leader.”

Solomon said Tuesday on “Hannity” that the U.S. government knew Ukraine was planning to look again into activities at Burisma Holdings, an energy company that employed then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son as a member of its board of directors, early this year. The report is noteworthy because President Trump has been accused by Democrats of threatening in July to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine unless its new president pursued an investigation into the company and the younger Biden’s role there.

“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” he claimed. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still Ukraine’s president at that time. – True Pundit

This is important because it could speak to the motive of the leaker. It had also been reported that the leaker previously worked with Joe Biden when he was Vice President. This information narrowed down this list of suspects. It’s important to know who is the person making the already debunked claims about the president’s phone call. The American people have the right to question the false accuser and scrutinize their motives and actions.

Now, Zero Hedge is reporting that Adam Schiff does not want the American people to find out who this leaker is:

A CIA ‘whistleblower’ who worked with former VP Joe Biden as well as two Adam Schiff (D-CA) aides has apparently gotten cold feet, and may not testify in front of the House Intelligence Committee in person or in writing, according to Schiff. This is in stark contrast to what Schiff’s late September claim that the man at the center of an impeachment inquiry against President Trump would testify in the House “very soon.” 

That was downgraded last week to testimony “in writing.” 

And finally, on Sunday, Schiff told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that the whistleblower’s testimony might not be needed after all. – Zero Hedge 

Interestingly, it seems as if Adam Schiff is worried the American people might discover some information that shows the leaker has a major conflict of interest.

@FOOL_NELSON on twitter has uncovered even more information about Eric Ciaramella, who may be the ‘whistleblower.’

From the Obama White House visitor logs.

So, Eric Ciaramella may have run the meeting that investigative reporter John Solomon has identified as ‘one of the earliest documented attempts to build up the now debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative.’

For those of you who are not aware of NABU, it is the ‘anti-corruption’ group backed by George Soros that is actually tasked with going after people investigating real corruption. Amazing Polly does a very good break down on this:

What else has been uncovered?

While Eric Ciaramella does deserve due process, so does the President. He does have some interesting connections that are worth investigating. Perhaps he can go on record and put the rumors to rest and explain himself.

More connections to the Atlantic Council have emerged. We have previously reported on the role of Lawfare Group, the Atlantic Council and the Brookings Institute in Trump-Russia collusion nonsense.

This individual had previously leaked one of the President phone calls to General Kelly. Claiming the President had coordinated the firing of Comey with ‘Putin,’ when in reality it was Rod Rosenstein who recommended the firing of James Comey based on his own leaking.

Eric Ciaramella also allegedly leaked classified information to CNN regarding Israeli intelligence and ISIS bomb-making capabilities back in 2017, an FCC complaint was filed.

So the question now becomes, is Adam Schiff knowingly assisting a CIA agent who leaked classified information to the press? Is he aware of this person’s alleged background as a partisan leaker? Is this why he is so desperate to keep the identity of the ‘whistleblower’ a secret?

This story is still developing, please check back for more updates. 

See a spelling or grammar error? Let us know! Highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You may also like...